Children carrying backpacks on a dirt road

Stronger proposals start with a realistic context analysis

We help you connect field realities, donor expectations, and strong project logic.

Organizations in conflict-affected and high-risk contexts face specific challenges:

Gerade in Konflikt- und Hochrisikogebieten ist dies häufig eine Herausforderung. Informationslagen sind fragmentiert, Zugänge eingeschränkt und Entwicklungen vor Ort können sich schnell verändern. Gleichzeitig steigen die Anforderungen an evidenzbasierte Planung, Konfliktsensibilität und die nachvollziehbare Begründung von Förder- und Programmentscheidungen.

01Risks change faster than reporting cycles.

02Standard methodologies often do not fit volatile environments.

03Reliable information from the ground can be difficult to access and assess.

Expectations from regulators, donors, investors, and other stakeholders are increasing while practical guidance often remains unclear.

We help you identify where you stand, what matters most, and which next steps are realistic.

When this fits

You are developing programs or proposals and need a stronger context, actor, or needs analysis.
Existing analysis is too generic to guide program design, advocacy, or funding.
You need to connect donor expectations, local realities, and a coherent results logic.

How we work

Clarify purpose and evidence needs

We define whether the analysis supports program design, fundraising, advocacy, or positioning.

Assess context, actors, and needs

We combine structured research with field-informed expertise and include local capacities and resources.

Translate evidence into program logic

We shape findings for problem statements, theory of change, MEAL, and proposal narratives.

What you get

A differentiated analysis beyond generic situation descriptions.
Stronger problem definition, objectives, and intervention logic.
More coherent funding materials linking context, need, activities, and outcomes.

Book a consultation

Approach

Methodology and specialization

Political economy analysis

We analyze power relations, incentives, actor interests, and local resources that shape programs and funding prospects.

Conflict sensitivity

Context analysis considers how planned activities may affect conflict dynamics and how risks can be reduced.

Actor, needs, and resource analysis

Affected groups, local capacities, informal structures, and real needs are translated into stronger program logic.

Donor mapping and proposal strategy

Findings are connected to donor priorities, theory of change, MEAL approach, and budget logic.

How we can support you

Practical consulting support

Selected areas of work

Context Analysis & Fundraising

Context, actor, and needs analyses plus strategic fundraising support.

Context-specific analysis

We adapt methods to your operating reality, stakeholder landscape, and risk exposure.

Systems and implementation

We help translate requirements, strategies, and policies into structures teams can use.

Value

What you gain

Stronger problem definition

Programs and proposals are grounded in context-specific reasoning rather than generic situation descriptions.

Better donor fit

Funding strategies connect local needs with realistic donor priorities and formal requirements.

More coherent results logic

Theory of change, activities, target groups, MEAL, and budget are developed from the same evidence base.

Clearer strategic choices

Organizations can identify which funding opportunities are worth pursuing and which would drain capacity.

Practice examples

Anonymized project scenarios

The following scenarios are generalized and do not include confidential client, country, or project details.

Proposal with an overly generic context analysis

Context: An organization developed a program for a complex context but could only describe problem drivers at a surface level.
Challenge: The proposal described needs but did not convincingly explain why the activities would work locally.
Approach: We strengthened actor analysis, problem framing, theory of change, and MEAL logic and linked them to donor priorities.
Outcome: The proposal became more coherent, more credible, and more clearly focused on impact and feasibility.

New fundraising strategy after program growth

Context: A civil society organization wanted to expand existing work but lacked a clear prioritization of potential donors.
Challenge: Several funding lines seemed relevant but carried different programmatic and administrative implications.
Approach: We mapped donors, requirements, strategic fit, and internal implementation capacity.
Outcome: The organization could focus resources on the strongest opportunities and prepare proposal narratives more precisely.

What sets us apart

You work directly with experienced consultants who understand complex operating environments.

Field-informed

Our work is grounded in direct experience in conflict-affected and high-risk contexts.

Practical

We focus on solutions that are usable, proportionate, and implementation-oriented.

Accountable

Outputs are designed to support documentation, review, donor requirements, and responsible decision-making.

Geographic focus: Europe · Middle East · Africa · Asia · Global remote support

Learn more about us

Frequently asked questions

Key questions from initial conversations about scope, process, and practical implementation.

Can the analysis feed directly into a funding proposal?

Yes. It can be structured to support the problem statement, target group description, theory of change, and MEAL approach.

Do you only work with existing data?

Not necessarily. Depending on scope, we combine document review, research, interviews, and field-informed expertise.

Do you also support proposal writing?

Yes. The engagement can combine analysis, fundraising strategy, and proposal development.

How do you adapt the work to high-risk contexts?

We adapt scope, methods, documentation, and delivery format to the operating context, stakeholder risks, and available team capacity.

Can this be combined with follow-up implementation support?

Yes. Most engagements can be structured as a focused assessment followed by implementation, training, or advisory support.

Let’s discuss your context

Phone

+49 179 162 4973

E-Mail

[email protected]