Human rights due diligence systems that work in practice

We help you design policies, responsibilities, documentation, and implementation pathways that remain usable under pressure.

Organizations in conflict-affected and high-risk contexts face specific challenges:

Viele HRDD-Systeme wurden für stabile regulatorische und organisatorische Kontexte entwickelt. In Konflikt- und Hochrisikogebieten entstehen menschenrechtliche Risiken und Umsetzungsschwierigkeiten jedoch vor allem durch das Zusammenspiel lokaler Machtstrukturen, politischer Dynamiken, Sicherheitslagen und eingeschränkter operativer Steuerbarkeit.

01Risks change faster than reporting cycles.

02Standard methodologies often do not fit volatile environments.

03Reliable information from the ground can be difficult to access and assess.

Expectations from regulators, donors, investors, and other stakeholders are increasing while practical guidance often remains unclear.

We help you identify where you stand, what matters most, and which next steps are realistic.

When this fits

You have policies and processes, but no coherent implementation logic.
Grievance, escalation, or remedy mechanisms do not work reliably in high-risk contexts.
You need to translate LkSG, CSDDD, UNGP, or stakeholder expectations into a workable system.

How we work

Map the current system

We review policies, roles, decision paths, documentation, and day-to-day implementation routines.

Prioritize gaps and interfaces

We identify where governance, practice, and evidence trails diverge.

Build the target system

We define roles, process logic, escalation paths, KPI approaches, and implementation steps.

What you get

An HRDD system that is operationally manageable, not just formally documented.
Clear responsibilities, escalation paths, and evidence requirements.
A realistic roadmap for improving existing structures.

Book a consultation

Approach

Methodology and specialization

Six-step HRDD process

System design is aligned with embed, assess, prevent and mitigate, track, remediate, and report, then translated into workable routines.

Compliance radar

LkSG, CSDDD, the UN Guiding Principles, and OECD Guidelines are interpreted in relation to operational reality.

Maturity model

Existing structures are assessed by implementation maturity, effectiveness, and usability, not just by whether documents exist.

Governance, escalation, and remedy logic

We define roles, decision paths, grievance channels, and remedy processes that can work under pressure.

How we can support you

Practical consulting support

Selected areas of work

Human Rights Due Diligence Systems

Build lean, robust HRDD systems for high-risk contexts.

Context-specific analysis

We adapt methods to your operating reality, stakeholder landscape, and risk exposure.

Systems and implementation

We help translate requirements, strategies, and policies into structures teams can use.

Value

What you gain

From policy to management system

The system clarifies who decides, documents, escalates, and follows up on which basis.

Audit-ready evidence trails

Documentation pathways are designed to serve internal decision-making and external scrutiny at the same time.

More effective remedy

Complaints, escalation, and remedy are embedded in governance and accountability instead of treated as isolated cases.

Proportionate implementation

Smaller or indirectly exposed companies can build lean but credible HRDD structures.

Practice examples

Anonymized project scenarios

The following scenarios are generalized and do not include confidential client, country, or project details.

Policies existed, implementation varied

Context: A company had policies and reports, but operational teams interpreted human rights requirements differently.
Challenge: Risk decisions, escalation, and evidence depended on individuals rather than a consistent system.
Approach: We reviewed roles, interfaces, grievance pathways, and documentation logic and built a prioritized target model.
Outcome: The organization received clearer responsibilities, a practical escalation logic, and an implementation roadmap.

Grievance and remedy gaps in a high-risk supply chain

Context: A company needed to show how concerns from a hard-to-access supply chain were received and addressed.
Challenge: Formal channels existed, but they were difficult for relevant stakeholders to access and poorly connected internally.
Approach: We redesigned accessibility, case handling, escalation, and remedy processes around the specific risk context.
Outcome: The system became more usable, more traceable, and better connected to management and compliance decisions.

What sets us apart

You work directly with experienced consultants who understand complex operating environments.

Field-informed

Our work is grounded in direct experience in conflict-affected and high-risk contexts.

Practical

We focus on solutions that are usable, proportionate, and implementation-oriented.

Accountable

Outputs are designed to support documentation, review, donor requirements, and responsible decision-making.

Geographic focus: Europe · Middle East · Africa · Asia · Global remote support

Learn more about us

Frequently asked questions

Key questions from initial conversations about scope, process, and practical implementation.

Does every company need a full HRDD system?

No. The required depth depends on risk exposure, business model, regulatory duties, and expectations from customers, investors, or partners.

Can we build on our existing compliance system?

Yes. We usually strengthen existing structures rather than replace them.

What is the difference between a policy and a system?

A policy states requirements. A system defines who decides, documents, escalates, and initiates remedy in practice.

How do you adapt the work to high-risk contexts?

We adapt scope, methods, documentation, and delivery format to the operating context, stakeholder risks, and available team capacity.

Can this be combined with follow-up implementation support?

Yes. Most engagements can be structured as a focused assessment followed by implementation, training, or advisory support.

Let’s discuss your context

Phone

+49 179 162 4973

E-Mail

[email protected]